<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sections &#187; Flickr</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.locusviridis.co.uk/sections/archives/tag/flickr/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.locusviridis.co.uk/sections</link>
	<description>The ramblings of a British Entomologist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 16:54:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Thoughts on Entomology &amp; Flickr</title>
		<link>http://www.locusviridis.co.uk/sections/archives/777</link>
		<comments>http://www.locusviridis.co.uk/sections/archives/777#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>L Livermore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entomology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hemiptera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flickr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mapping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.locusviridis.co.uk/sections/?p=777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am a fan of Flickr and think it&#8217;s a wonderful place to store and tag photos. Recently I&#8217;ve been wondering about how useful Flickr is as an entomological resource and thought of a few questions:

How many new insect photos are being added daily?
How common are misidentifcations?
How many insect photographers add geographic data (geotags)?
What is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a fan of <a title="Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/">Flickr</a> and think it&#8217;s a wonderful place to store and tag photos. Recently I&#8217;ve been wondering about how useful Flickr is as an entomological resource and thought of a few questions:</p>
<ul>
<li>How many new insect photos are being added daily?</li>
<li>How common are misidentifcations?</li>
<li>How many insect photographers add geographic data (geotags)?</li>
<li>What is the number of unique insects represented on Flickr?</li>
<li>How could Flickr be used in an insect-based meta-analysis?</li>
</ul>
<p>As I wrote this there were (searching everyone&#8217;s uploads with no filter):</p>
<ul>
<li> 839,123 results for &#8216;insect&#8217;</li>
<li>28,014 results for &#8216;hemiptera&#8217;</li>
<li>1,673 results for &#8216;pentatomidae&#8217;</li>
<li>816 results for &#8216;palomena prasina&#8217;</li>
</ul>
<div id="attachment_781" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 476px"><img class="size-full wp-image-781" title="Flickr map of Palomena prasina © Yahoo 2009" src="http://www.locusviridis.co.uk/sections/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/palomenaprasinamap2.png" alt="Flickr map of Palomena prasina © Yahoo 2009" width="466" height="453" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Flickr map of Palomena prasina © Yahoo 2009</p></div>
<p>I found that there have been around 1,000 extra hits for insect everyday in the past week and that searching for &#8216;palomena prasina on the Flickr map gave ~217 results (depending on the type of sort) which were spread around the UK, France, northern Spain, Germany, Finland, Belgium and the Netherlands.</p>
<p>As I browsed through general search results for the <em>Palomena prasina</em> photos, I saw a few that were obvious misidentifications. I think that misidentifications are probably the biggest limiting factor that would be hard to control if you wanted to use Flickr tags/information in an academic way. Whilst there are plenty of very knowledgeable Flickr entomologists, it&#8217;s hard to know which photos are identified correctly.</p>
<p>Whilst the map search was interesting, it wasn&#8217;t overly useful in it&#8217;s basic form. I think that a more sophisticated map search might be possible using of the Flickr API, but you would still be limited by the proportion of images that have geographic data.</p>
<p>Finally, everyone tags and organises their photos differently. I try and enter in as much information as I can without it being too long or bothersome. For an insect shot I try and include: country, county, area name, specific location (like the nature reserve), class, order, family and genus+species. By doing this I can search for particular insects in different areas quite easily. I started added a few six-figure grid references to the images, but as every specimen has a map location, this isn&#8217;t a priority for me.</p>
<p>I feel that Flickr could be used in a more powerful way and have a few ideas how, but I&#8217;ll save that for another post.</p>
<p>For now, why not check out some of the Flick insect groups? I&#8217;ve linked a few below:</p>
<ul>
<li><a title="Flickr: British Bees, Wasps and Ants (Hymenoptera)" href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/british-hymenoptera/">British Bees, Wasps and Ants</a></li>
<li><a title="Flickr: British Beetles" href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/britishbeetles/">British Beetles</a></li>
<li><a title="Flickr: British Bugs - Heteroptera only! :-) " href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/301751@N25/">British Bugs</a></li>
<li><a title="Flickr: British Flies (Diptera) " href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/413853@N21/">British Flies</a></li>
<li><a title="Flickr: British Lepidoptera" href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/80519997@N00/">British Lepidoptera</a></li>
<li><a title="Flickr: Fly Day Friday" href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/flydayfriday/">Fly Day Friday</a></li>
<li><a title="Flickr: UK Orthoptera" href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/779048@N25/">UK Orthoptera</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.locusviridis.co.uk/sections/archives/777/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
